Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt. Ltd

High Court 19 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Issue: The question of law formulated is as under : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal erred in conforming the order of the CIT(A) and holding that the assessee is eligible for deductions u/s.

Decision: In the light of that, order of the Tribunal as also the Assessing Officer is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration and dispose it off according to law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1016 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt. Ltd.. Respondent Mr. R.G. Bhat i/by Pankaj Kapoor for Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondents. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 19TH JULY,2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 19TH JULY,2007 P.C.: P.C.: . Admit. Heard fortieth. . The revenue has preferred this appeal against the order dated 13.2.2004 of the I.T.A.T. The question of law formulated is as under : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal erred in conforming the order of the CIT(A) and holding that the assessee is eligible for deductions u/s. 80-HH, 80-I and 80-IA of the Act treating that the activity of texturising and twisting of the yarn is a manufacturing activity?" . The counsel for the assessee fairly states that (-2-) the issue has specifically not been dealt with as required both by Assessing Officer and Tribunal. In the light of that, order of the Tribunal as also the Assessing Officer is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration and dispose it off according to law. Appeal disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan