The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Chemet
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Chemet
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Chemet, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2417 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1305 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Chemet ... Respondent
Mr. R.G. Bhat for Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
533 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that the file was sent to the Law Ministry
for drafting the appeal memo on 27.1.2005 and
thereafter the appeal was ultimately drafted on
16.6.2006. In our view, the aforesaid period of
more than 1.1/2 years for drafting of appeal memo
cannot be said to be reasonable. In the
circumstances, sufficient cause is not shown to
condone the delay. Hence, Notice of Motion is
dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue