In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Cheminova India Limited, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1236 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 640 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Cheminova India Limited ... Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. There is delay of 262 days. Heard parties. The respondent considering the facts on record not opposes the condonation of delay. In the light of that, motion allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to register the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.