Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. C...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Cheminova India Limited

High Court 15 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Cheminova India Limited
Date of order
15 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Cheminova India Limited, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The appeal was filed on the following question of law. "Whether, in the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was right in holding that payments made towards Provident Fund are allowable as deduction even if the cheques have been presenetd after the due dates?" .

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 640 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Cheminova India Limited ... Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007 P.C. P.C. . The appeal was filed on the following question of law. "Whether, in the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was right in holding that payments made towards Provident Fund are allowable as deduction even if the cheques have been presenetd after the due dates?" . This court in CIT Vs. Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation in Income Tax Application No. 14 of 2000 dated 25.11.2000 has also taken a view that if ((-2-)) the amount is paid within the grace period, then it would be said to be paid within the due date and amount will be allowed to be deducted as expenditure. This issue was furhter considered and reiterated by this court in Income Tax Appeal Nko. 1155 of 2007 in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. WMI Cranes Ltd. decided on 9th October, 2007. . Considering the above, the question as raised would not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan