Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. D...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dainty Investment & Leasing Pvt. Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dainty Investment & Leasing Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Failure to removethe office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution.3.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3063 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1731 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax.Vs. ..Appellant. M/s. Dainty Investment & Leasing Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta and Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry with Raj Darak for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY,2008. PC :1. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.There is a delay of 329 days. Considering the causeshown, delay condoned subject to the appellant paying tothe respondent costs quantified at Rs.7500/- ascondition precedent within 12 weeks from today. Onfailure to pay the costs within stipulated period,appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution.2. Further, office objections, if any, should beremoved within 12 weeks from today. Failure to removethe office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution.3. It is open to the revenue to recover the costs to bepaid from the officers concerned, if it is found that delay in filing the appeal was caused on account of their negligence. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.