Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Da...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dawood & Company

High Court 09 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dawood & Company
Date of order
09 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dawood & Company, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3950 OF 2007ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3950 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2430 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3955 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) 2428 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3956 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) 2429 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3957 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) 2427 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantVs.M/s Dawood & Company... Respondents ... Respondents Mr. Suraj Shah for Appellant.Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for Respondent P.C. :- CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 9TH APRIL, 2008 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellantand learned counsel for the respondent. Perusedthe affidavits filed in support of the Notice ofMotions. The Notices of Motion are filed forcondonation of 276 days delay in filing the aboveappeals. Sufficient cause is shown for condoningthe delay. There is no case of inaction,negligence or want of bonafide on the part of theappellant. Notices of Motion are made absolute interms of prayer clause (a). 2.Notices of Motion are disposed ofaccordingly with no order as to costs. ( DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan