The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dayaram And Co
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dayaram And Co
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dayaram And Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2648 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1294 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Dayaram and Co. ... Respondent
Mr. R.G. Bhat with Mr. R.K. Sharma for the
Appellant.
Mr. Sameer Khandekar for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
418 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that no dates have been given between the
date of passing hte order by ITAT on 31.4.2004 and
filing of hte appeal on 24.7.2006. The explanation
is vague and unacceptable. Hence, since no
sufficient cause is shown, notice of motion stands
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue