The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dgp Windsor (I) Ltd
High Court
14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dgp Windsor (I) Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Dgp Windsor (I) Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay, Appeal does not survive and it is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1699 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 667 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Vs.
M/s DGP Windsor (I) Ltd. .... Respondent
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale & Mr. B.M. Chatterji for
Appellant
Ms. Dipti Raja for Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
. The delay is of 488 days. The cause shown
in the Affidavit in support of the motion would not
amount to sufficient cause. In the light of that,
motion stands dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 667 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Vs.
M/s DGP Windsor (I) Ltd. .... Respondent
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale & B.M. Chatterji for the
Appellant.
Ms. Dipti Raja for Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
. In view of dismissal of the Notice of
Motion for condonation of delay, Appeal does not survive and it is disposed of accordingly. Refund of court fees as per rules. Certified copy
expedited.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue