The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Eagle Films
High Court
04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Eagle Films
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Eagle Films, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4274 OF 2007
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2246 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2246 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2246 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Eagle Films ... Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Ms. Beena Pillai for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 04, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 04, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
. There is delay of 999 days. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Even otherwise, the issue is covered by the judgment of this court in 267 ITR 488. In the light of the same, Notice of Motion along with appeal dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue