Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Es...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Esjay International Pvt. Ltd

High Court 03 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Esjay International Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Esjay International Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is therefore dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1438 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s Esjay International Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant..Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3rd JULY, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. Office objections overruled. Registry is directed to register appeal. The Appeal is taken for admission by consent of parties. The issue sought to be raised revolve around reopening of the assessment beyond the period of four years. The Tribunal has taken up all the circumstances and appreciated the same and came to the conclusion that there was no failure on the part of Assessee to disclose full material facts recorded by the Revenue. We see no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Appeal is therefore dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan