Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. F...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Foresto India Ltd

High Court 24 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Foresto India Ltd
Date of order
24 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Foresto India Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 701 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3273 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Foresto India Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 645 days in preferring the appeal. We have considered the cause shown as also the questions of law as framed in the appeal. All the questions are covered by the judgments in favour of the assessee. . Even otherwise, in our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficinet cause.Hence, motion along with appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan