Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Gad Shipping And Transport Pvt. Ltd

High Court 03 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Gad Shipping And Transport Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Gad Shipping And Transport Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, Appeal stands dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2788 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s. Gad Shipping and Transport Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3rd JULY, 2009 P.C. Heard. Learned counsel for the Revenue submits that no Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay. The delay in fling the above appeal is of 1072 days. In this view of the matter, Appeal stands dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan