The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G.l. Ice Creams
High Court
12 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G.l. Ice Creams
Date of order
12 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G.l. Ice Creams, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3775 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1637 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. G.L. Ice Creams ... Respondent
Mr. R.G. Bhat for the Appellant.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is delay of 364 days. The learned counsel
states that the respondents have been served. There
is nothing on record to that effect. The learned
counsel to file zerox copy of the affidavit of
service. In the affidavit in support, it is
contended that the draft appeal memo was received on
2.12.2004. It appears that no stamp papers were
available upto 10.11.2005 and the appeal was filed
on 30.11.2005. There is no affidavit contesting the
said averments. In our opinion considering the
cause shown, the same amounts to sufficient cause.
Hence, delay condoned. Office to register the
appeal.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.