Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G.r. Shipping Ltd

High Court 17 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. G.r. Shipping Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: On failure to remove office objections, appeal stands dismissed without further order from this court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 479 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX (L) NO. 4006 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax Versus .. Respondent M/s. G.R. Shipping Ltd. ... Ms. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2009 P.C. P.C. . Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal subject to the condition that the appellants remove office objections, if any, within six weeks from today. On such office objections being removed, appeal to be registered. On failure to remove office objections, appeal stands dismissed without further order from this court. Appellant to serve copies of the appeal memo on the respondents. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.