The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gupta Textiles
High Court
25 Nov 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gupta Textiles
Date of order
25 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gupta Textiles, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in same terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 521 of 2010Date of Decision: 25.11.2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Versus
M/s Gupta Textiles
....Appellant
...Respondent.
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.
PRESENT: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant.
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
1.This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C', New Delhi passed in ITA No.1990/Del/08 dated 6.11.2009 for the assessment year 2004-05,proposing to raise following substantial questions of law:-
“i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in allowingdeduction u/s 80HHC on the face value of DEPB inthe case where turnover exceeds Rs.10 crores inview of proviso (ii), (iii) and (iv) inserted by theTaxation Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 withretrospective effect from 01.04.1998?
ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case, the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in allowingdeduction u/s 80HHC in respect of entire DEPBamount by incorporating the same in the computationof business profit u/s 28(iiib)?”
2.Learned counsel for the revenue points out that identicalappeal being ITA No. 299 of 2010 (Commissioner of Income-tax v.
M/s F.C. Sondhi & Company (P) Ltd.) filed by the revenue wasallowed by this Court on 16.8.2010 and the matter remanded to theTribunal.
3.Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in same terms. Thematter may be taken up before the Tribunal on December 20, 2010along with connected matters and the Tribunal may thereafter proceedin accordance with law after due notice to the assessee.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
November 25, 2010gbs
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.