In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Halliburton Oil Field Services (I) Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As no sufficient cause is made out, Appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2752 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.M/s. Halliburton Oil Field Services (I) Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellantNone for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3[rd] JULY, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. The learned counsel for the Revenue seeks condonation of delay of 1102 days in presenting the above appeal. He further submits that no Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. No material facts has been brought on record. As no sufficient cause is made out, Appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue