The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd
High Court
06 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd
Date of order
06 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3449 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1473 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. ... Respondent
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. B.M. Chatterjee for
Appellant.
Mr. S.P. Mehta for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: AUGUST 06, 2007
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 06, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The delay is of 331 days. We have perused the
affidavit filed by Garima Jain, Deputy Commissioner
of Income Tax in support of the motion. There is no
explanation for the delay between the period
18.12.2003 and 4.1.2004. Considering the above, in
our opinion, cause shown would not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue