The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Haware Engineers & Builders
High Court
09 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Haware Engineers & Builders
Date of order
09 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Haware Engineers & Builders, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 1691 of 2013 and the order dated 9th January, 2015 in Appeal No.164 of 2013, the present appeals also stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.113 OF 2015
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.140 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax....AppellantCentral-II, Mumbai
Vs.
M/s Haware Engineers & Builders....RespondentPvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai
Mr. Ashok Kotangale i/by Ms. Padma Divakar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Nishit Gandhi i/by Mr. Mihir C. Naniwadekar for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 9 JUNE, 2017
PER COURT :
The present appeals pertain to Assessment Years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010.
2The learned counsel for the Appellant fairly concedes that the issues raised in the present appeals have been considered an decided against the Revenue in Income Tax Appeal No. 1691 of 2013 and Income Tax Appeal No. 164 of 2013.
3In light of the above and for the reasons recorded in the order dated 3rd August, 2015, in Appeal No. 1691 of 2013 and the order dated 9th January, 2015 in Appeal No.164 of 2013, the present appeals also stand dismissed. However, no order as to costs.
( G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.