The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hindustan Construction Company
High Court
19 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hindustan Construction Company
Date of order
19 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hindustan Construction Company, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4081 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2372 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Hindustan Construction Company
Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale for
the Appellants.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. The respondents have been served. None
present.There is delay of 218 days. There is
affidavit in support. The averments have not been
contested. Hence, cause shown amounts to sufficient
cause. Delay condoned. Office to register the
Appeal.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue