The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. Ltd
High Court
19 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. Ltd
Date of order
19 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 110 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2317 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. Ltd.. Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale for
the Appellants.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning the
delay of 220 days in filing the main tax appeal. On
perusal of the affidavit in support of the notice of
Motion, we find that the file was sent to the panel
counsel for drafting the appeal memo on 7.1.2006 and
thereafter the appeal was not drafted till
10.11.2006. In our view, the delay period between
7.1.2006 and 10.11.2006 has not been properly
explained. In the circumstances, sufficient cause
is not shown to condone the delay. Hence, Notice of
Motion is dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.