Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. I...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Indokem Ltd

High Court 15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Indokem Ltd
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Indokem Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The appeal has been preferred on the following questions : "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order of C.I.T.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Indokem Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.A.D. Kango with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008 P.C. P.C. . The appeal has been preferred on the following questions : "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order of C.I.T. (A) by holding that the amount paid to the employees under the voluntary retirement Scheme was covered u.s. 10(19B) and hence, action u.s. S. 201(1) of the I.T. Act was not justified?" . The appellant before the tribunal was Revenue. The learned tribunal has considering the facts on record concurred with the findings on record by ((-2-)) Commissioner (Appeals), that it was under the bona fide belief and consequently the default was for good and sufficient reasons. In our opinion considering that two concurrent findings of fact, the question of law as framed would not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan