Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jaipur Metals & Electricals Ltd., Jaipur

High Court 26 Oct 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

26 Oct 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jaipur Metals & Electricals Ltd., Jaipur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the fact that original addition is not survived in the substantive appeal, penalty will not survive, therefore, thereference is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR. DB Income Tax Reference Application No.26/2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Jaipur Metals & Electricals Ltd., Jaipur. DATE OF ORDER ::: 26.10.2016.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDRA MAHESHWARI Mr. Anurup Singhi, for the appellant. In view of the fact that original addition is not survived in the substantive appeal, penalty will not survive, therefore, thereference is accordingly disposed of. (MAHENDRA MAHESHWARI), J. (K.S. JHAVERI), J. Asheesh Kr. Yadav25

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.