The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jatta Poly Yarn Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jatta Poly Yarn Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jatta Poly Yarn Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4102 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2251 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Jatta Poly Yarn Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr.
P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of 205 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that in this case after receipt of hte draft
appeal, stamp papers for filing the appeal has been received by the Authorities on 2.8.2006. The appeal came to be filed more than three months latter i.e.
received by the Authorities on 2.8.2006. The appeal came to be filed more than three months latter i.e. on 8.11.2006. By our earlier order we had directed
that the better affidavit should be filed explaining
the delay between 2.8.2006 and 8.11.2006. Today, we
are inforemd that no such better affaivit has been
filed. In our view, the aforesaid period has not been properly explained. In the circumstances, sufficient cause is not shown to condone the delay.
Hence, Notice of Motion is dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.