The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.gala Builders
High Court
02 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.gala Builders
Date of order
02 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.gala Builders, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly there is no merit in this appeal which is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. J.Gala Builders ... Respondent
Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for the Appellant.
Mr. P.V. Irani with Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: APRIL 02, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: APRIL 02, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The revenue is in appeal on the following
question :
"The substantial question of law is whether
in the facts and circumstances of the case
and in law, the Tribunal is right in
upholding the order of CIT(A) who held that
AO is not justified in rejecting method of
accounting consistently followed and
substituting the same with an un recognized
method of accounting to determining the
income and deleting the addition?"
. The learned tribunal in its impugned order noted
that the assessee has been following percentage
completion method since years together and if
(-2-)
revenue wanted to disturb the same by substituting
another method, then it was necessary that the
similar method should be imposed by the assessee for
all the other assessment years. Otherwise it will
result in double taxation and illogical assessment
and accordingly upheld the order of C.I.T. (A). We
uphold the reasoning given by the Tribunal.
Accordingly there is no merit in this appeal which
is dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.