Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.gala Builders

High Court 02 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.gala Builders
Date of order
02 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.gala Builders, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly there is no merit in this appeal which is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. J.Gala Builders ... Respondent Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for the Appellant. Mr. P.V. Irani with Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: APRIL 02, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: APRIL 02, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . The revenue is in appeal on the following question : "The substantial question of law is whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in upholding the order of CIT(A) who held that AO is not justified in rejecting method of accounting consistently followed and substituting the same with an un recognized method of accounting to determining the income and deleting the addition?" . The learned tribunal in its impugned order noted that the assessee has been following percentage completion method since years together and if (-2-) revenue wanted to disturb the same by substituting another method, then it was necessary that the similar method should be imposed by the assessee for all the other assessment years. Otherwise it will result in double taxation and illogical assessment and accordingly upheld the order of C.I.T. (A). We uphold the reasoning given by the Tribunal. Accordingly there is no merit in this appeal which is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan