Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.m. Share & Stock Brokers

High Court 12 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Sep 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J.m. Share & Stock Brokers, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3023 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1282 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. J.M. Share & Stock Brokers Ltd. Mumbai. ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants. Mr. Ajay R. Singh for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 505 days. The order was received by the department on 25.2.2004. The file was forwarded to the Law Ministry, the date of which is not clear. The file was received by the Law Ministry on 24.7.2004. The appeal was preferred on 7th October, 2005. There is no sufficient explanation for the said delay. In our opinion, considering the same, this would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.