Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. J...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jogiya Traders Pvt. Ltd

High Court 02 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jogiya Traders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Jogiya Traders Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. B.M.Chatterjee with Mrs.Poonam Bhosale for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ.DATED: JULY 02, 2008 CORAM: F.I. K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED: JULY 02, 2008 P.C. P.C. . The questions raised were answered against the Revenue by the Tribunal relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Apollo Tyres Ltd. Vs. C.I.T. (2002) 255 ITR 273. On the similar issue, we have followed the said judgment in ITXA No. 607 of 2005 in the case of C.I.T. Vs. M/s. Akshay Textiles Trading decided on 17.10.2007. In our opinion, therefore, the question of law as framed would not arise. Hence, appeal dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.