The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Johnson & Johnson Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Johnson & Johnson Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Johnson & Johnson Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to deposit the costs, appeal to stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3862 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2804 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Johnson & Johnson Ltd.
... Respondent
Mr.R. Ashokan for hteAppellant.
Mr. P.C. Tripathi with Mr. S.S.Shetty and Mr.RajeshS. Shetty for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 09, 2009
P.C.
. The delay is of 78 days.
. Considering the cause shown, the same amount to sufficient cause. Delay condoned on petitioner paying respondents cost quantified
Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) within four
weeks from today.
. On such cost being
paid, office to register
appeal. On failure to deposit the costs, appeal to
stand dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
wouldtheat
the
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue