The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kapurthala Ferozepur Kshetriya Gramin Bank
High Court
04 Apr 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kapurthala Ferozepur Kshetriya Gramin Bank
Date of order
04 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kapurthala Ferozepur Kshetriya Gramin Bank, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
I.T.A. No.25 of 2011 Date of decision: 4.4.2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax
-----Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Kapurthala Ferozepur Kshetriya Gramin Bank.
-----Respondent
and connected appeals being ITA Nos.26, 28 and 29 of 2011
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:-Mr. Vivek Sethi, Standing Counselfor the appellant. for the appellant.
---
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
This order will dispose of I.T.A. Nos.25, 26, 28 and 29of 2011 as all the four appeals involve same questions.
I.T.A. No.25 of 2011 has been preferred by therevenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (forshort, “the Act”) against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Amritsar dated 10.8.2010 in ITA No.309(ASR)/2010 forthe assessment year 2006-07 claiming following substantialquestions of law:-
“(1)Whether the Tribunal was right in law in disallowingthe claim of the assessee bank for deduction u/s 80Pthe claim of the assessee bank for deduction u/s 80P
(2)(a)(i) in respect of income earned from utilization ofits reserve funds being statutory reserves u/s 67(2) ofthe Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act 1961?(2)Whether the assessee bank is entitled to claimdeduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) in respect ofincome earned from utilization of its voluntaryreserves other than the statutory reserves mentionedabove?”
Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that thematter is covered against the revenue by order of this Court dated2.2.2010 in I.T.A. No.594 of 2009 in CIT v. M/s ShivalikKshetriya Gramin Bank.
Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of eachconnected case.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
April 04, 2011ashwani
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.