The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Kec International Ltd
High Court
15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Kec International Ltd
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Kec International Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question of law framed is as under : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order of the CIT (A) and directing the A.O. to allow interest u/s.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. KEC International Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. S.M. Shah with Mr. Sandeep Wasnik and Mr. P.S.
Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. P.J. Pardiwala i/by Shaunak Satpute & Co. for
Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. We are concerned with the assessment year
1983/84. The question of law framed is as under :
"Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was
justified in law in confirming the order of
the CIT (A) and directing the A.O. to allow
interest u/s. 214 of the I.T. Act as per
the original assessment order?"
. The appeal was preferred by the Revenue. The
tribunal noted that Section 214 was substituted with
((-2-))
effect form 1.4.1985 and as per the notes of
clauses, the amendment was to take effect from
1.4.85-86 and subsequent years. We are in agreement
with that finding. It is therefore, clear that the
amendment is prospective and did not apply to the
earlier assessment years. Considering the above,
the question of law would not arise. Hence, appeal
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.