Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. K...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Kesaria Commercial Enterprises Ltd

High Court 07 Jun 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Kesaria Commercial Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
07 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Kesaria Commercial Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal NO. 858 of 2000 The Commissioner of Income-tax .... Appellant. vs. M/s. Kesaria Commercial Enterprises Ltd. .. ... . ... Respondents A. K. Kotangale with Dr. P. Daniel for AppellantNone for Respondents. CORAM:S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND Date: 7/6/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S. Radhakrishnan J.) 1.Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2.By this appeal the appellant is seeking to raise the followingquestion of law: “Whether on the facts and circumstances of thecase, the Tribunal was justified in deleting theinterest levied under sections 217 and 139(8) in re-assessment order by holding that theamended provisions of Section 215 and Section 139 relating to the definition of regular assessment is not applicable to the case of the assessee?” 3. We have perused the Order dated 27[th] October 1999 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, wherein it is clearly held that in caseof re- assessment, there is no question of levying interest undersections 217 and 139(8) of the Income-tax Act, and the variousjudgments to that effect, referred to in the order of the Tribunal, oneof them being upheld by the Supreme Court. Under the aforesaidfacts and circumstances we find no substantial question of lawinvolved in the above. Hence the appeal is dismissed. S. RADHAKRISHNAN J. A. S. AGUIAR J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan