In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Landmark Education India, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 402 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax...... Appellant.
vs.
M/s Landmark Education India....
Respondent.
Shri Parag Vyas i/b H.D. Rathod for the Appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 23rd August 2005.
P.C. :----
CIT vs.Pithwa
Engg.Works (2005) 276 ITR 519 (Bom)
there is no merit in the application.Application is,
therefore, rejected with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)(V.C. DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.