Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Le...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Leela Scottish Lace Pvt.ltd

High Court 22 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Leela Scottish Lace Pvt.ltd
Date of order
22 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Leela Scottish Lace Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Needless to state that the Assessing Officer need not be influenced in any manner by the original assessment order, order passed by the CIT(A) and the ITAT order which have been set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 856 of 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant vs. M/s Leela Scottish Lace Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr.Nitesh Joshi with Mr.Atul K.Jasani and Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 22nd September,2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 22nd September,2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondent for some time. By consent the following order is passed. 2. The impugned orders passed by ITAT dated 12th November, 1999, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 26th November, 1990 and the original assessment order dated 31st March, 1989 stand set aside as far as the substantial question of law involved in the present appeal is concerned. 3. It is also agreed that the Assessing Officer shall de novo pass the assessment order as expeditiously as -2- possible after perusal of all the records that may be produced by the assessee as well as by the Department and all issues and contentions of the both parties are expressly kept open. Needless to state that the Assessing Officer need not be influenced in any manner by the original assessment order, order passed by the CIT(A) and the ITAT order which have been set aside. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan