Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Madhumilan Syntex Ltd

High Court 12 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Madhumilan Syntex Ltd
Date of order
12 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Madhumilan Syntex Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2929 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1204 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Madhumilan Syntex Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants. Mr. F.I. Irani with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 386 days. Considering the time taken by the Law Department, we have in several cases condoning the delay. In the instant case, we find that the file was received by the Law Department on 21.2.2005 and the appeal was filed on 30.9.2005. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between receipt of the file and filing of the appeal memo. . The learned counsel for the respondents contend that there is no sufficient cause for condonation of delay. After having considered the affidavit, we agree with the learned counsel for the respondents ((-2-)) that there is no sufficient explanation for the delay. In the light of that cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan