The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Man Aluminium Ltd
High Court
12 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Man Aluminium Ltd
Date of order
12 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Man Aluminium Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3247 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1384 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Man Aluminium Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. S.M. Shah for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is delay of 466 days. There is affidavit
in support of motion. The approval for filing the
appeal was granted on 8.7.2004. The appeal was
filed on 21.10.2005. There is no explanation
offered for the delay between 8.7.2004 and
21.10.2005. The averments in Para No. 4 are
general and vague. Considering the above, the same
would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion
dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue