The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manmala Exhibitors
High Court
18 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manmala Exhibitors
Date of order
18 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manmala Exhibitors, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1053 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1053 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Manmala Exhibitors ... Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. In respect of both the questions as framed by the
department, findings of fact are recorded by the
C.I.T. (A) which has been confirmed by the I.T.A.T.
Nothing has been brought to our notice to show that
the said findings are perverse.In the light of that
the questions would not arise. Conveniently appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue