Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Me...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Megha Property & Developers

High Court 14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Megha Property & Developers
Date of order
14 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Megha Property & Developers, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Office to register the appeal subject to checking whether court fees are properly paid.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2002 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) 782 IF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant Vs. M/s Megha Property & Developers .... Respondent Mrs. P.P. Bhosale & Mr.B.M. Chatterji for Appellant. Mr. Balkrishna Javeri for Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & . J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C. . The delay is of 114 days and we have considered the affidavit in support of the motion. Considering the delay in the Law Department, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. In the light of that, motion made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to register the appeal subject to checking whether court fees are properly paid. If any deficiency is found in the court fees, Department is allowed to pay the same. 2 ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)( F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan