Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S .M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S .Mehratex India P. Ltd

High Court 15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S .Mehratex India P. Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S .Mehratex India P. Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: On the motion made by learned counsel for appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1711 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 316 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s .Mehratex India P. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. J.S.Saluja for the Appellant. Mr. S. Shetty for the Respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 15[th] June,2009 DATE : P.C. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. By consent of parties delay in filing the appeal is 109 days. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion stands disposed of. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the substantial question of law herein raised was confirmed by the Supreme Court. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. On the motion made by learned counsel for appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Thus dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to mention that appellant is not entitled for refund of court fees. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan