In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Narmada Cement Co. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, appeal also stands dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2270 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2782 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s. Narmada Cement Co. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3rd JULY, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. The delay in filing the above appeal is of 634 days. We were taken through the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. The averments made therein are absolutely vague. No material facts or particulars are disclosed. No sufficient cause has been shown. In this view of the matter, Notice of Motion is rejected.
In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion, Appeal does not survive. Therefore, appeal also stands dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue