The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. National Peroxide Ltd
High Court
21 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. National Peroxide Ltd
Date of order
21 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. National Peroxide Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question of law as formulated is as under : "Whether the assessee is not entitled to claim additional depreciation allowance on the increase cost of assets on account of exchange rate fluctuation?" .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 887 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. National Peroxide Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant.
Ms. Beena Pillai i/by D.M. Harish & Co. for
Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: AUGUST 21, 2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 21, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The question of law as formulated is as under :
"Whether the assessee is not entitled to
claim additional depreciation allowance on
the increase cost of assets on account of
exchange rate fluctuation?"
. We have perused the impugned order of the
tribunal The tribunal has relied on the judgment of
this court in Padmaji Pulp & Paper Mills Ltd. Vs.
CIT 210 ITR 97 (Bom). Nothing has been brought to
our attention, showing that this court subsequently
or Supreme Court has taken a different view. In the
light of that question as formulated would not
arise. Hence, appeal dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.