The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. National Radio & Electronics Co. Ltd
High Court
13 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. National Radio & Electronics Co. Ltd
Date of order
13 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. National Radio & Electronics Co. Ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
I. T. Appeal NO. 939 of 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... ... Petitioner
vs.
M/s. National Radio & Electronics Co. Ltd. .. ... Respondents
A. K. Kotangale for Petitioners
B. C. Tripathi for Respondents.
CORAM:S. RADHAKRISHNAN ANDA. S. AGUIAR J.J.
P.C.
Date: 13/6/2005
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel forthe Respondents. The following substantial question of law is soughtto be raised in this appeal:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case the Tribunal was justified in law inholding that the expenditure incurred by theassessee in India in providing facilities like airfare, train fare etc., to the fees for technicalservices and no tax is deductible at source inrespect of these expenditure?”
2. Both the learned counsel for Petitioners and the Respondents fairlystate that the issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered
and answered in favour of the assessee in Commissioner of Income
Tax VS. Tata Engineering Co. Ltd., (Bom.) 245 ITR (Bom.) 923. Inthe aforesaid facts and circumstances, as the issue has already beenconcluded by this court by the aforesaid judgment of this Court,dismiss the above appeal.
S. RADHAKRISHNAN J
A. S. AGUIAR J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.