The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Nicholas Piramal India
High Court
15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Nicholas Piramal India
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Nicholas Piramal India, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 516 OF 2001
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2001
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 518 OF 2001
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.519 OF 2001
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.520 OF 2001
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 521 OF 2001
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 522 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Nicholas Piramal India
Ltd. Thane. ... Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. We have dismissed Income Tax Appeal No. 432 of
2001 by a detailed order. For the reasons set out
therein, the question of law as framed would not
arise. Consequently appeals dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue