Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. O...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Okasa Pharma Pvt. Ltd

High Court 04 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Okasa Pharma Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
04 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Okasa Pharma Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1800 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 820 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Okasa Pharma Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: APRIL 04, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: APRIL 04, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the cause shown, delay condoned subject to appellant paying cost to the Respondent quantified at Rs.2500/- within eight weeks from today and removing the office objections, if any within the said period. On paying the cost and office objections being removed, appeal to be registered. On failure to comply with either of the conditions, motion stands dismissed for non prosecution without further order from this court. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan