The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Oriental Containers Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Oriental Containers Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Oriental Containers Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3759 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1287 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Oriental Containers Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
Mr. S.M. Kazi for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
656 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that the file was sent to the Law Ministry
for drafting the appeal memo on 8.10.2004 and thereafter the appeal was not drafted till 23.6.2006. In our view, the aforesaid period has
not been properly explained. In the circumstances,
sufficient cause is not shown to condone the delay.
Hence, Notice of Motion is dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue