The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Parle Beverages Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Parle Beverages Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Parle Beverages Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1444 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 781 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Parle Beverages Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr.
P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
Mrs. Vasanti Patel for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. There is delay of 240 days. There is affidavit in support of the Motion. The order was received on 5.5.2005. The Chief CIT granted approval for filing
of the appeal on 26.8.2005. The file was sent to
Ministry of Law on 26.8.2005 itself. Though it is
not set out, we may take judicial notice that in
December, 2005 the Ministry of law transferred all
matters to department for preferring appeals by
appointing new counsel. The docket was prepared on
2.2.2006. It is however, pointed out that as there
was heavy workload of time barred assessment in the
month of March 2006, the appeal could only be filed
on 28.4.2006. Appearance put up on behalf of the
((-2-))
respondents. An affidavit has been filed also
opposing the condonation of delay. Considering the
facts set out and the difficulties that the
department was and also considering the tax
incidence, in our opinion, the cause shown would
amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion allowed
in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to register
the appeal.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.