Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Pa...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parle Plastics Ltd & Anr

High Court 23 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parle Plastics Ltd & Anr
Date of order
23 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parle Plastics Ltd & Anr, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Issue: After hearing the parties, we are of the view that additionalsubstantial question of law needs to be framed as below : " Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, for the purpose of availing of allowable deduction under Section 80(IA) ofthe Income Tax Act,1961, the total income of the asse...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 599 OF 2005INTAX APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2002 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/S PARLE PLASTICS LTD & ANR ... Applicant ... Respondents Mrs. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr. H. Rai with Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocates forRespondent No.1. -Coram:D. G. KARNIK &F. M. REIS, JJ.-Date:23rd August, 2010 23rd August, 2010 P.C. By an order dated 20th September, 2005, this Court had directedthat the Civil Application will be heard along with the Tax Appeal. The learned Counsel appearing for the parties however, submits thatthe Civil Application may be heard and decided first so that theparties can address us on the additional question of law, if any, thatmay be framed in pursuance to the Civil Application. Request isgranted. 2. After hearing the parties, we are of the view that additionalsubstantial question of law needs to be framed as below : " Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, for the purpose of availing of allowable deduction under Section 80(IA) ofthe Income Tax Act,1961, the total income of the assessee is requiredto be computed by deducting allowable depreciation under Section 32even if the assessee had not claimed it ?" 3. Ordered accordingly. at* D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan