Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Pa...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parsik Janata Sahakari Bank

High Court 14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parsik Janata Sahakari Bank
Date of order
14 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parsik Janata Sahakari Bank, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently, notices of motion along with the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1518 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 626 OF 2005 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1519 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO. 625 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant Vs. M/s Parsik Janata Sahakari Bank .... Respondent Ltd. Mrs. P.P. Bhosale & Mr. B.M. Chatterji for Appellant. Ms. Asifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C. . As the issue of law is covered by the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ratnagiri District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. reported in 254 I.T.R., 697 (Bom), questions of law do not arise. Consequently, notices of motion along with the appeals are dismissed. 2 Refund of court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan