The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Perfect Valves
High Court
31 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Perfect Valves
Date of order
31 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Perfect Valves, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4223 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2156 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Perfect Valves ... Respondent
Mr. R. Asokan and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.
Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: OCTOBER 31, 2007
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 31, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. There is delay of 310 days in preferring the
appeal. There is affidavit filed by Mr. P.K.Rath,
Asst. Commissioner in support of the motion. We
have perused Para 4 of the affidavit setting out the
cause as to why the appeal could not be filed.
Considering what is set out in para 4(f),(g), (h)
and (i) the cause would not amount to sufficient
cause. Consequently Motion dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue