The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Pfizer Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Pfizer Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Pfizer Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to deposit the costs, appeal to stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4142 OF 2008 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2042 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4142 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2042 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Pfizer Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. Sureshkumar for the Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200
9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200
9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200
P.C.
. The delay is of 308 days.
. Considering the cause shown, the same would
amount to sufficient cause. Delay condoned on the
petitioner paying respondents cost quantified at
Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand Five Hundred Only)
within four weeks from today.
. On such cost being paid, office to register the
appeal. On failure to deposit the costs, appeal to
stand dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.