Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ph...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Phil Corp. Ltd & Anr

High Court 05 Sep 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Phil Corp. Ltd & Anr
Date of order
05 Sep 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Phil Corp. Ltd & Anr, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2002 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ....Appellants M/S PHIL CORP. LTD & ANR ....Respondents Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the apppellant. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the respondent No.1. P.C. -Coram:R. M. LODHA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. -Date:5th September, 2005 Heard. It is common ground that this tax appeal arises out of theassessment order made under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. Itis also common ground that subsequent thereto, the regular asssessmentorder has been passed by the Assessing Officer and that the order underSection 143(1)(a) has merged in the said regular assessment order. The learned Counsel for the parties, therefore, agree that thesubstantial question of law framed in the present appeal is not required tobe answered as it is only of academic value. We, accordingly, dispose of the appeal as infructuous. No costs. R. M. LODHA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan