Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr Shah Share & Stock

High Court 26 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr Shah Share & Stock
Date of order
26 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr Shah Share & Stock, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Ms. PR Shah Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Dr. K. Shivram with Mr.A.R. Singh for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED: JUNE 26, 2008 P.C. . In so far as first question, question No. (a) of Para 5 the learned tribunal on considering the facts of the case, held that the losses suffered were business losses. That is purely a finding of fact. Consequently appeal as filed on that ground would not be maintainable. . In so far as question (b) is concerned, there are concurrent findings of fact by the Commissioner (Appeals) as also by ITAT in favour of the assessee. Once there are concurrent findings of fact, the question of law does not arise. Consequently appeal on that ground also dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan