The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr Shah Share & Stock
High Court
26 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr Shah Share & Stock
Date of order
26 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Pr Shah Share & Stock, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Ms. PR Shah Share & Stock
Brokers Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Dr. K. Shivram with Mr.A.R. Singh for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ.
DATED: JUNE 26, 2008
P.C.
. In so far as first question, question No. (a) of
Para 5 the learned tribunal on considering the facts
of the case, held that the losses suffered were
business losses. That is purely a finding of fact.
Consequently appeal as filed on that ground would
not be maintainable.
. In so far as question (b) is concerned, there are concurrent findings of fact by the Commissioner (Appeals) as also by ITAT in favour of the assessee.
Once there are concurrent findings of fact, the
question of law does not arise. Consequently appeal
on that ground also dismissed.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.